Implicit Nativist Attitudes, Social Desirability, and Immigration Policy Preferences
ثبت نشده
چکیده
While previous research on immigration attitudes among the American public has focused on factors such as economic threat, social context, and racial prejudice, fewer studies have examined the psychological determinants of immigration policy preferences. This study analyzes the results of an implicit association test (IAT) procedure which measures automatic nativist preferences for traditional American culture verses Latino-American culture (i.e. implicit nativist attitudes). In brief, this study demonstrates that implicit nativist attitudes are fairly common, that they are an independent predictor of immigration policy attitudes, and that they affect those who are not explicitly nativist but who still hold restrictionist policy views. Note: A previous version of this article was presented at the 2010 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. The author would like to sincerely thank Rene Rocha, Caroline Tolbert, David Redlawsk, Tracy Osborne, Mary Campbell, Christopher Federico, and several anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback and suggestions.
منابع مشابه
Assessing the effect of social desirability on nativism attitude responses.
Attempts to measure and analyze public opinion attitudes toward racial/ethnic minorities often confront the "social desirability" problem: those who have prejudiced attitudes are rarely willing to admit them to surveyors. Instead, they may be more likely to give a socially acceptable answer rather an accurate reflection of their views. Previous research has clearly established that this effect ...
متن کاملPatterns of implicit and explicit attitudes in children and adults: tests in the domain of religion.
Among the most replicated results in social cognition is the split between explicit and implicit attitudes; adults demonstrate weaker group-based preferences on explicit rather than implicit measures. However, the developmental origins of this pattern remain unclear. If implicit attitudes develop over a protracted period of time, children should not demonstrate the implicit preferences observed...
متن کاملExplicit Evidence on the Import of Implicit Attitudes: The IAT and Immigration Policy Judgments
The implicit association test (IAT) is increasingly used to detect automatic attitudes. Yet a fundamental question remains about this measure: How well can it predict individual judgments? Though studies find that IAT scores shape individual evaluations, these inquiries do not account for an array of well-validated, theoretically relevant variables, thus raising the challenge of omitted variabl...
متن کاملFraming Labels and Immigration Policy Attitudes in the Iowa Caucuses: ‘‘Trying to Out-Tancredo Tancredo’’
We use an experiment built into a series of surveys of Iowa voters during the 2008 Iowa Caucus campaign to test the effect of differing group framing labels on immigration policy preferences. We find that certain framing labels matter, but only among Republican partisans for whom the immigration issue is important. We also find that issue importance produces more conservative policy preferences...
متن کاملSocial Desirability Bias in Smoking Cessation i TITLE: Effects of social desirability bias on self-report and non self-report assessments during smoking cessation BY:
Social desirability response bias (SDR) is the tendency of respondents to respond in a way that will be viewed favorably by others. Little research has examined the effect of SDR in the context of cigarette smoking cessation. Adult smokers were recruited for smoking cessation treatment. They completed self-report, biological, and implicit attitude measures. SDR scores, assessed using the Balanc...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2012